Access to Quality Seed in Uganda: the Contribution of Farmers’ Local Seed Businesses to the Seed Sector

Executive Summary

Seed is a foundation in crop production and therefore a significant component in transforming smallholder agriculture for the development of agricultural economies. The Integrated Seed Sector Development (ISSD) program in Africa that has over the years played a key role in improving availability of and access to quality seed for the rural farm households. One component of ISSD is the ISSD Plus project in Uganda, implemented by Wageningen UR Uganda (WUU) in collaboration with National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO) and the private sector.

The ISSD Plus project aims to strengthen the development of a vibrant, pluralistic and market-oriented seed sector that is able to address key challenges that hamper the seed sector development in Uganda. The project introduced Quality Declared Seed (QDS) of mainly non-hybrid crops to be produced at community level by trained farmer groups. It empowers skilled and market-oriented farmer groups through a Local Seed Business (LSB) approach, and has since 2012 supported over 264 LSBs in 59 districts across Uganda.

To assess the contribution of the LSBs to the seed sector in Uganda, this study was commissioned focussing on assessing availability, accessibility, affordability and quality of QDS of seven priority crops; beans, groundnuts, potato, rice, soybean, sesame and cassava in six regions of Uganda over the last four years (2016-2020). The regions are Kigezi, Ankole, Rwenzori, Eastern, West Nile and Northern region.

The study used mixed methods including literature and document review, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, case studies, household survey and a local market survey which involved LSBs and agro-input dealers in the study area. The household survey involved farmer beneficiaries of the ISSD Plus project (farmers in sub counties where LSBs were established and supported), and a control group (farmers from other sub counties which did not directly participate in the ISSD Plus project and where there were no LSBs).

Using a mixture of purposive, stratified and random sampling methods, respondents for the seven crops supported (LSBs farmers and target beneficiaries), farmers from sub counties without LSBs (control), and other seed actors (formal and informal) were selected and interviewed. From each region, two districts were selected with the guidance of ISSD technical staff. In each district 140 farmer beneficiaries and 160 non-beneficiaries (control) were selected making a total sample of 1,800 farm households. In addition, in each district four FGDs (two for beneficiaries and two for control), 12 key informant interviews and one case study were conducted.

The data collected were processed using MS Excel, SPSS (version 25), and STATA 13 computer software, and analysed using descriptive and regression analysis. In the analysis, QDS availability was defined as seed supply or the physical quantity of QDS available to farmers from LSBs and any other sources. QDS access was defined as effective demand for the seed, given the prevailing intrinsic and extrinsic factors, while QDS affordability was defined as farmers’ ability to access and use QDS in required quantities, quality and time. QDS quality was assessed using qualitative methods based on farmers’ perceptions, attitude and knowledge of seed quality attributes.

Study findings on quality seed availability show that in the last three years the supply of QDS by LSBs for all the seven crops has generally been increasing, with the decline in 2018 attributed to the prolonged dry season that affected planting. From 2016 to 2019, bean seed supply increased by 293%, potato by 1,373%, rice by 1,020%, soybean by 562% and groundnuts by 82%. However, sesame seed declined by 5% due to lack of foundation seed, and cassava cuttings also declined by 37% because of low market demand that discouraged LSBs from expanding production.

Despite increased production of QDS in the past few years, there is a general consensus that QDS is still in small quantities and therefore not readily available. Considering all the crops, only 39.3% of the entire sample said QDS is readily available. Overall, the market share of QDS is small (at 10% for season A of 2019 and 6.4% for season B), with home saved seed and grain from the market taking the bigger share of the total seed planted. Although the majority (64.5%) farmers reported availability of enough crop varieties, quite a big percentage (e.g. 40% in rice, 50% in potato and 64% in beans) reported inadequacy in quantity of QDS produced. About 45% of the farmers buy seed from LSBs (35.2% from individual members of LSB groups and 9.4% from LSB stores). Farmers find it convenient to buy from a neighbouring seed farmer than going to the LSB store. The key factors affecting the supply of QDS by LSBs include limited access to foundation seed (FS), quality of FS, limited land and limited capital.

To request for this publication write to email: info@issduganda.org

Share this Post:>>>>

Related Study Reports

...

Adoption processes of good horticulture practices in northern Uganda

Learn More
...

Affordability and willingness to pay for hybrid drought tolerant maize seed: anchoring and learning

Learn More
...

Assessment of the Performance of the Seed Subsector Regulatory and Institutional Framework in Uganda

Learn More
...

Adoption of Advanced Vegetable Production Technologies and Practical Extension Methods promoted by ISSD Plus


Learn More
...

QDS – filling the gap between formal and informal seed systems: a case of common bean in Uganda


Learn More
...

Towards climate resilient local seed business in Uganda: Exploring farmers’ perceptions on climate change and its impact on local seed systems

Learn More
...

Uganda Early Generation Seed Study: Unlocking Pathways for Sustainable Provision of EGS for Food Crops in Uganda


Learn More
...

White Paper on the COVID-19 Crisis and the Seed Sector in Africa: Impact, Options for Actions and Recommendations


Learn More

Our Development Partners